GH GambleHub

Path from signal to action

Signal to action path

"Signal" by itself does not change anything. Value appears when a signal is standardized, interpreted, prioritized, turned into a decision and action, and then the result is returned to the system as feedback. Below is a practical pipeline and a minimal set of artifacts to keep this path fast, repeatable and safe.

1) Signals: sources and standards

Sources: product events, telemetry/logging, payments/CUS, RG/fraud indicators, APM/SLA, external feeds (FX, registries).
Event schema (canonical): 'signal _ id', 'type', 'entity _ id', 'ts _ event', 'ts _ ingest', 'severity', 'payload', 'source', 'confidence'.
Qualitative requirements: idempotency ('signal _ id'), exact time, UTC + locale, PII masks, schema version.

Anti-patterns: "floating" fields, local time formats, absence of 'source '/' version'.

2) Sense: normalization, dedup, enrichment

Normalization: uniform directories, currencies/timezones, name schemes.

Deduplication: key '(entity_id, type, window)' + payload hash; keep a "reason for pooling."

Feature-join: RFM, geo/device, risk scores, cohorts, campaign context.
Quality: noise filters, confidence, checking invariants (for example, 'amount ≥ 0').

3) Validate: "is this important and is this our case?"

Correlation vs causality: flag signals requiring causal verification (DiD/experiments) → not to be confused with incident triggers.
Duplicates of effects: connection with already active actions (so as not to "fine" twice).
Eligibility policies: RLS/CLS, RG/compliance rules, contact frequency limits.
Hysteresis: input threshold ≠ output; "cool-off" for flapping signals.

4) Prioritize: How to choose what to do first

Priority evaluation (example):
[
\textbf{Priority} = \text{Severity}\cdot w_s;+; \text{Propensity}\cdot w_p;+; \text{Value}\cdot w_v; -; \text{Risk}\cdot w_r; -; \text{Cost}\cdot w_c
]

Severity: strength of the deviation from the norm/thresholds.
Probability of success (model/uplift).
Value: expected economic effect (LTV uplift, prevented damage).
Risk/Cost: operational, RG/compliance, probability of harm to the user.
SLA: deadlines by signal type (P1/P2...).

Action queue = sort by'Priority 'based on quotas and rate-limit on intervention types.

5) Decide: how to make a decision

Three levels of automation:

1. Rules (policy-as-code): transparent, fast, basic cases.

2. Models (score-based): probabilities/ranks + threshold/hysteresis.

3. Adaptive policies (bandits, RL): online learning, personalization.

Decision table

ConditionContextActionGuardrailsAutomation level
`RG_risk ≥ τ` & `night_window`beginnersPause + RG tipFPR≤1%Car
`churn_propensity ≥ τ1` & `value_quantile ≥ 0. 8`retentionPersonal offerROMI≥0, cap=1/7дCar
`fraud_score ∈ [τ2,τ3]`paymentEscalation to manual checkSLA 2hHuman-in-the-loop

6) Act: orchestration and performance

Channels: in-app, e-mail, push, SMS, call, limits/restrictions, tickets.
Orchestrator: guaranteed delivery (retry/backoff), idempotency of actions ('action _ id'), transactionality.
Conflicts: priorities and mutual exceptions (e.g. promo ≠ RG intervention).
Loads: rate-limit per channel/user/segment, queue with DLQ.
Audit: log "signal → decision → action → result" (end-to-end 'correlation _ id').

7) Learn: Effect and Feedback

Action metrics: coverage, take-rate, success (conversion/risk reduction), latency, NPS/complaints.
Causal assessment: A/B, DiD, synthetic control; uplift @ k, Qini/AUUC for targeting.
Auto-tuning: updating thresholds/policies; bandits (ε -greedy/TS) within guardrails.
Loop closure: new features/signals from the results; archive of rules/versions.

8) Guardrails and safety

Data quality: freshness, completeness, drift PSI; quality drop = automation stop valve.
Operating: p95 solution time, orchestrator availability, error budget.
Ethics/RG/compliance: prohibition of aggressive offers at risk, explainability of decisions, transparent reasons for actions for the user.

Hysteresis and cooldown: Prevent measure flashing and audience "fatigue."

9) Observability and SLO

Conveyor SLO: "Signal→Decision p95 ≤ 2 sec; Decision→Action p95 ≤ 5 sec; data freshness ≤ 15 min."

Dashboards: funnel "signaly→deystviya," priority map, guardrails-alerts.
Logs and trace: 'trace _ id/correlation _ id', failure metrics, retrays, percentage of manual escalations.
Runibooks: degradation scenarios (feed drop, signal spike, channel delays).

10) Data schemes and contracts (minimum)

Event-Signal (JSON)

json
{
"signal_id": "sig_...uuid",
"type": "churn_risk",
"entity_id": "user_123",
"ts_event": "2025-10-31T22:15:00Z",
"ts_ingest": "2025-10-31T22:15:05Z",
"severity": 0. 82,
"confidence": 0. 93,
"source": "model:v4",
"payload": {"rfm":"H1","country":"EE","platform":"ios"},
"version": "1. 2"
}

Decision/Action (tabular)

`action_id`, `correlation_id`, `entity_id`, `policy_version`, `decision` (enum), `channel`, `queued_at`, `sent_at`, `status`, `guardrail_flags[]`.

11) Economics of solutions: when action is beneficial

Expected value:
[
\mathbb{E}[EV] = p_{\text{успех}} \cdot \text{Value} - p_{\text{вред}} \cdot \text{Harm} - \text{Cost}
]

Threshold: Run the action if 'EV ≥ 0' and guardrails are normal.
Budgets: caps by segment/channel, allocation by margin.
Multi-goals: cascade - first security (RG/fraud), then economics, then UX.

12) Maturity levels (matrix)

1. Ad-hoc: manual reactions, no logs.
2. Repeatable: rule templates, basic auditing, restricted metrics.
3. Managed: single orchestrator, prioritization, A/B assessment.
4. Optimized: adaptive policies, bandits, auto-tuning thresholds, end-to-end causal control.
5. Safe-autonomy: autonomous actions within rigid guardrails, formal verifications.

13) Artifact patterns

A. Signal passport

Code/version, definition, source, scheme, fresh SLO, deduplication rules, enrichment, owners, quality (tolerances), risks.

B. Policy Passport/Policy

ID, conditions, data/features, action, hysteresis/cooldown, guardrails, user explanation, version/changelog.

C. Runbook incident

Symptom (alert), tracing, data quality check, disabling/lowering the auto-level, contact persons, "return to the green zone" criterion.

14) Check list before loop release

  • Signals are standardized; there is dedup and enrichment
  • Prioritization and queues are implemented; quotas and rate-limit configured
  • Policies/thresholds are documented; hysteresis and cooldown are active
  • The orchestrator of actions is idempotent; end-to-end audit
  • Guardrails and SLO specified; alerts and runibooks are ready
  • Causal effect estimate set up (A/B/DiD or sandboxed bandits)
  • Dashboards "Signal→Action→Outcome" and quality metrics in prod
  • Versioning and feedback process (learn) is closed

Total

A reliable signal-to-action path is a pipeline, not a set of scripts: standardized events → meaningful prioritization → managed decisions (with rules/models) → secure orchestration of actions → causal assessment → automatic learn loop. Such a contour makes the data operable, the measures precise, and the effect measurable and reproducible.

Contact

Get in Touch

Reach out with any questions or support needs.We are always ready to help!

Start Integration

Email is required. Telegram or WhatsApp — optional.

Your Name optional
Email optional
Subject optional
Message optional
Telegram optional
@
If you include Telegram — we will reply there as well, in addition to Email.
WhatsApp optional
Format: +country code and number (e.g., +380XXXXXXXXX).

By clicking this button, you agree to data processing.