GH GambleHub

Hierarchy of ecosystem levels

1) Why formalize levels

There is no single "correct" layer, but there are stable invariants between layers: order, finality, integrity, privacy, quotas/prices. Hierarchy formalization:
  • gives agreements (SLO/SLA, API, data schemas, rights/limits);
  • eliminates "complex monolith" → accelerates releases and scaling;
  • Reduces cost of ownership (clear handoff, transparent error budgets)
  • delayet治理 and auditing reproducible.

2) High-level map

1. L0 - Physics/Infrastructure. DC/clouds, L2/L3 networks, GPU/CPU, storage, POP/edge.
2. L1 - Transport/Routing. QUIC/HTTP/3, Latency Mesh, QoS, anycast, balancing.
3. L2 - Data Availability (DA) and Logs. Publications, butches, merkly roots, retention.
4. L3 - Execution and Status. Sequencers, VM/performers, consensus/finality.
5. L4 - Messages and Order. Splints, outbox/inbox, idempotency, causality by key.
6. L5 - Services/Microservices. Billing, catalogs, moderation, orchestrators, analytics.
7. L6 - Domains and Value Modules. Game/content domains, marketplaces, affiliates.
8. L7 - Economics and Incentives. Fares, RevShare, reward pools, insurance.
9. L8 - 治理/Politiki/Pravo. Voting, quorums, rule codification and sunset.
10. L9 - Community/Roles/Reputation. RNFT relationships, R/S, onboarding, appeals.

End-to-end loops: Safety/Compliance, Observability (logs/metrics/trails), Data Governance.

3) Interfaces between levels (contracts)

Each interface captures: APIs/schemas, invariants, SLOs, access policies, events/audits.

L0↔L1 (Infra→Transport):
  • Invariants: MTBF/MTTR, throughput, packet loss.
  • SLO: p95 RTT by region, POP availability.
  • Access: ABAC by role, egress limits.
L1↔L2 (Transport→DA):
  • Invariants: guarantor of delivery to DA, publication windows.
  • SLO: batch finalization ≤ N × T _ block, via input ≥ X GB/h.
L2↔L3 (DA→Ispolneniye):
  • Invariants: immutability, hashes/roots, order of batches.
  • SLO: reorg rate≈0, challenge windows documented.
L3↔L4 (Ispolneniye→Soobshcheniya):
  • Invariants: strict-order per key, idempotence, deadup.
  • SLO: out-of-order ≤ 10⁻⁶/soobshch.
L4↔L5 (Soobshcheniya→Servisy):
  • Invariants: event schemas, versions, retrai contract.
  • SLO: success ≥ 99. 9–99. 99% per QoS.
L5↔L6 (Servisy→Domeny):
  • Invariants: domain APIs, business rule validators, migrations.
  • SLO: backward compatibility ≥ X months, migrations with feature-flags.
L6↔L7 (Domeny→Ekonomika):
  • Invariants: measurability of value (NetRev, margin, Cost-to-Serve).
  • SLO: calculation of payments ≤ T, accuracy ≥ 99. 95%.
L7↔L8 (Ekonomika→治理):
  • Invariants: transparent formulas, right of appeal.
  • SLO: SLA propozala→apruva ≤ time, audit decision trail.
L8↔L9 (治理→Soobshchestvo):
  • Invariants: R/S vote modifiers, RNFT rights/penalties.
  • SLO: TTC appeals ≤ T, publication of cadence reports.

4) Level invariants (minimum requirements)

Security: signatures/keys, immutable logs, integrity control.
Order/Finality: strictly by key; consideration of challenge windows.
Privacy/Compliance: DID/VC, ZK threshold proofs, geo/age/sanctions.
Observability: correlation 'x _ msg _ id' through L1...L7; passing events.
Evolution: schema versions, feature-flags, canary/shadow, rollback.

5) Anti-patterns and their medicines

End-to-end monolith: one service "knows everything." → Decomposition by L4/L5, event contracts.
Floating boundaries: "flip" responsibility. SLA → and RACI matrix on interfaces.
Hidden queues: manual retraction without contracts. → Outbox/Inbox + idempotency.
Mixing compliance with business logic: → Compliance Gate as a pass-through layer.
Version chaos: breaking API without migrations. → SemVer + feature flags, sunset procedures.

6) Maturity model

M0 - Spontaneity: monolith, manual processes, no SLO.
M1 - Layers named: base contracts, partial tracing.
M2 - Contracts formalized: events/schemes, error budgets, A/B releases.
M3 - Autonomous domains: independent releases, RNFT rights, R/S, cost-aware routing.
M4 - Total synergy: AI orchestration, inter-chain portability, public otchetnost治理.

Transitions: Each step requires: (1) interface contracts, (2) telemetry, (3) migration plan, (4) chaos tests.

7) Metrics and SLO by level (reference)

L0: MTBF/MTTR, power/cooling SLA, link loss.
L1: p50/p95/p99, TailAmplification(p99/p50), retry%, anycast hit-rate.
L2: DA throughput, finality lag, retention, proof availability.
L3: success/1k, reorg/orphan, deterministic replay, gas/step.
L4: duplicate ratio, out-of-order, DLQ depth, replay success.
L5: error budget burn, deploy success without rollback, p95 API.
L6: domain conversion, rule accuracy, listing/moderation time.
L7: NetRev, margin/message, Cost-to-Serve, payout accuracy.
L8: TTC proposals, share of sunset edits, trace audit.
L9: v治理 participation, R distribution, share of appeals and MTTR on them.

8) Economy between levels

Chargeback chain: who compensates for the incident? L3/L4 → insurance pool (S-pledges) → L7 clearing.
Pricing: L1/L2/L3 - per-req/per-GB; L5 — per-API; L6 — per-value event; L7 - tariffs and RevShare.
QF (Quality Factor): bonus/penalty on payments to providers for SLO.

9) Safety/Compliance (through layer)

Policies: geo, age, sanctions, export/retention.
ZK control: proof of thresholds without disclosure.
Audit: non-replaceable logs, merkly snapshots, external cadence audit.
Incidents: Stop taps, quorums, post mortems and signatures.

10) Observability and dashboards

Layer Overview: SLO/SLA heat map by level and region.
Interface Health: errors/latency at boundaries (Lk↔Lk+1).
Tail & Finality: p95/p99, finality lag, DLQ/replay.
Economy Panel: Cost-to-Serve, margin/event, QF by provider.
Governance: queue of proposals, apruva time, versions of scales.
Compliance: locks/red areas, reporting to regulator.

11) Implementation playbook

1. Inventory of the current architecture. Overlay services on the L0...L9.
2. Defining interfaces. For each pair of Lk↔Lk+1: API/schemes/SLO/audit.
3. End-to-end tracing. Embed 'x _ msg _ id' and event passports.
4. Data contracts. Schemas, versions, migrations (SemVer + feature-flags).
5. Safety and compliance circuits. DID/VC, ZK, export policies.
6. Economics. Tariffs per level, QF, insurance fund, RNFT rights.
7. 治理. Change procedures, quorums, sunset clauses, public reports.
8. Chaos/Game-days. DA/bridge/POP drop, price shocks, geo blocks.
9. Pilot. One domain → inter-chain escalation → scaling.
10. Retro-calibration. According to SLO/Economics/Incidents.

12) KPIs of successful hierarchization

Operating system: reduced MTTR/interface incidents, increased deploy-no-rollback.
Quality: p95/p99 ↓ with stable throughput; DLQ depth ↓, replay success ↑.
Economy: Cost-to-Serve ↓, margin/event ↑, predictability of payments.
治理: TTC props ↓, share of sunset edits on time ↑, transparency.
Compliance: 100% pass geo/age/sanctions, zero critical violations.
Growth: onboarding time of the new domain/ ↓ chain.

13) Delivery checklist

  • L0...L9 Card and Layer Owners (RACI)
  • Interface contracts (API/Schemas/SLO/Audit) executed
  • End-to-end tracing and event passports implemented
  • Compliance Gate and ZK circuits are connected
  • Versioning/migration policies and feature-flags work
  • Strata economics (tariffs/QF/escrow) described and tested
  • Level/interface dashboards and alerts are active
  • Chaos practices and post-mortems in cadence
  • 治理 processes and public reporting established
  • Pilot passed, recalibration complete

14) Glossary

DA (Data Availability): data publication/evidence layer.
Finality: irreversible state/transactions.
Outbox/Inbox: guaranteed delivery and idempotence.
RNFT: Relationship/Rights/Limits Contract and KPIs.
R/S: reputation of quality and economic guarantee of responsibility.
QF: multiplier of payments by quality.
Sunset: temporarily editing parameters with auto-rollback.
Tail Amplification: p99/p50 - the strength of the "tail" of delays.

15) The bottom line

The hierarchy of ecosystem levels is an operational map: where the boundaries of responsibility pass, which invariants should not be violated, and how to measure success. With clear interfaces, end-to-end observability, security and an economy-driven ecosystem, the ecosystem becomes scalable, predictable and sustainable - from hardware and routing to domain values, i治理 incentives.

Contact

Get in Touch

Reach out with any questions or support needs.We are always ready to help!

Start Integration

Email is required. Telegram or WhatsApp — optional.

Your Name optional
Email optional
Subject optional
Message optional
Telegram optional
@
If you include Telegram — we will reply there as well, in addition to Email.
WhatsApp optional
Format: +country code and number (e.g., +380XXXXXXXXX).

By clicking this button, you agree to data processing.