GH GambleHub

Operations and → Management Documentation of Operations as Code

Transaction Documentation as Code

1) The essence of the approach

Documentation as Code is a practice in which operational knowledge, instructions, and processes are stored, edited, and validated in the same way as code: through Git, pull-requests, review, and CI validation.
In an operational loop, this forms the basis for reliability, transparency, and command compatibility.

Main objective:
  • Create a living, reproducible and versioned knowledge system, where each instruction is an artifact of the infrastructure, and not an outdated PDF.

2) Why do you need it

Transparency: you can see who, when and why changed the procedure.
Consistency: all teams work on current versions.
Integration with CI/CD: automatic validation of instructions.
Replicability - Infrastructure and documentation are synchronized.
Security: access control and auditing via Git.
Onboarding acceleration: New operators see exact code-related scenarios.


3) Main facilities

ArtifactFormatAppointment
RunbookMarkdown/YAMLinstructions for incidents and routine activities
SOP (Standard Operating Procedure)Markdownstandardized procedures
PlaybookYAML/JSONautomated steps for CI/CD, DR, on-call
PostmortemMarkdown + YAML metadata templatepost-incident analysis and conclusions
BCP/DRPMarkdown + schemescontinuity and recovery plans
PolicyYAMLoperational rules and restrictions

4) Repository architecture


ops-docs/
├── README.md        # описание структуры
├── standards/
│  ├── sop-deploy.md
│  ├── sop-oncall.md
│  └── sop-release.md
├── runbooks/
│  ├── payments-latency.md
│  ├── games-cache.md
│  └── kyc-verification.md
├── playbooks/
│  ├── dr-failover.yaml
│  ├── psp-switch.yaml
│  └── safe-mode.yaml
├── postmortems/
│  └── 2025-03-17-bets-lag.md
├── policies/
│  ├── alerting.yaml
│  ├── communication.yaml
│  └── security.yaml
└── templates/
├── postmortem-template.md
├── sop-template.md
└── playbook-template.yaml

Tip: each folder has its own Git repository or submodule so that different teams can manage content independently.


5) Format and standards

Metadata (front-matter YAML):
yaml id: sop-deploy owner: platform-team version: 3.2 last_review: 2025-10-15 tags: [deployment, ci-cd, rollback]
sla: review-180d
Markdown structure:

Цель
Контекст
Последовательность шагов
Проверка результата
Риски и откат
Контакты и каналы
YAML-playbook (example):
yaml name: failover-psp triggers:
- alert: PSP downtime steps:
- action: check quota PSP-X
- action: switch PSP-Y
- action: verify payments latency < 200ms rollback:
- action: revert PSP-X

6) GitOps and change processes

Pull Request = RFC documentation changes.
Review: Domain owner and Head of Ops must approve.
CI validation: structure check, mandatory fields, Markdown/YAML linter.
Automatic publishing: after merge - generating HTML/wiki/dashboards.
Change log: auto-history of changes with dates and authors.
Alert reminders: document revision every N days (by SLA).


7) CI/CD integration

Lint checks: Markdown syntax, YAML validity, owner/version fields.
Link-check: checking URLs and internal links.
Docs-build: converting to HTML/Confluence/portal.
Diff analysis: what has changed since the last release of the documentation.
Auto-sync: updating links in dashboards Grafana, Ops UI, Slack.
Review bots: tips for outdated sections or missing owners.


8) Integration with operational tools

Grafana/Kibana: annotations and links to the corresponding runbook directly from the panel.
Incident Manager: "Open Runbook" button when creating a ticket.
On-call portal: issuance of current SOPs and playbooks by incident category.
AI assistants: repository search, TL generation; DR and action tips.
BCP panels - Automatically loads DR instructions when a script is activated.


9) Document Lifecycle Management

StageActionResponsibleTool
CreationDraft SOP/runbookDomain OwnerGit PR
ReviewContext, format, validity checkHead of OpsPR Review
PublicationMerge + portal generationCI/CDDocs-pipeline
MonitoringSLA revisions, linter versionsOps-boatCI
ArchivingTranslation to 'deprecated'SRE/ComplianceGit tag

10) Automation and synchronization

Docs bot: checks which documents are out of date.
Version badge: '! [last review: 2025-05]' right in the cap.
Runbook-finder: by alert opens the desired document by tag.
Templates-generator: creates new SOPs by template ('make new-sop "Deployment"').
Audit-sync: Associates the SOP version with the system release and commit-ID.


11) Security and privacy

RBAC per repository: only domain owners can edit.
Secrets and PII: Cannot be kept in open documents; only links to protected vaults.
Audit: log of all changes, reviews and publications.
Update Policy: Review of SOPs every 6 months.
Backups: regular repository snapshots and portal caches in the DR zone.


12) Maturity metrics

MetricsPurpose
Coverage≥ 90% of key processes have an SOP/runbook
Review SLA≤ 180 days between revisions
Broken Links0 in CI
Owner Coverage100% of documents with owner
Consistency≥ 95% of documents are valid in structure
Usage Metrics≥ 70% of incidents use runbook link
AI Access100% of documents are available through the RAG index

13) Anti-patterns

Documentation is stored in Google Docs without versions and owners.
Runbook is not updated after releases.
SOP refers to legacy commands/tools.
No CI validation: Markdown with errors and broken links.
Duplicate the same instructions in different locations.
Lack of owners and review process.


14) Implementation checklist

  • Identify domain owners and document owners.
  • Create Git repository 'ops-docs/' and SOP/runbook/playbook templates.
  • Configure CI checks and linters (Markdown/YAML).
  • Configure Auto-Publish to Portal or Wiki.
  • Integrate with Grafana/Incident Manager.
  • Add an Ops bot for reminders and SLA revisions.
  • Train docs-as-code workflow commands.

15) 30/60/90 - implementation plan

30 days:
  • Create repository structure, templates, CI linter and PR review process.
  • Migrate key SOPs and 5-10 critical runbooks.
  • Set up auto-build in the portal.
60 days:
  • Implement integrations with Incident Manager and Grafana.
  • Connect Ops bot for audits and reporting.
  • Update the postmortem template and link to the dashboard incident.
90 days:
  • Full coverage of SOP/runbook (≥90%).
  • Enter KPI: Coverage, Review SLA, Usage.
  • Retro on the convenience and quality of the "docs-as-code" process.

16) Example of SOP template (Markdown)


SOP: Deployment через ArgoCD id: sop-deploy owner: platform-team last_review: 2025-10-15 tags: [deployment, rollback, argo]

Цель
Обеспечить безопасное и управляемое развертывание сервисов через ArgoCD.

Контекст
Используется для всех микросервисов с шаблоном Helm v2+.
Требует активного GitOps-контура и включенных health-checks.

Последовательность шагов
1. Проверить статус `argocd app list`
2. Выполнить `argocd app sync payments-api`
3. Убедиться, что `status: Healthy`
4. В случае проблем — `argocd app rollback payments-api --to-rev <rev>`

Проверка результата
SLO API доступность ≥ 99.95%, алертов нет.

Риски и откат
- Ошибка синхронизации — rollback.
- При повторных ошибках — эскалация Head of Ops.

Контакты
@platform-team / #ops-deploy

17) Integration with other processes

Operational analytics: Coverage and SLA audit reports.
Operator training: training based on real runbooks.
Postmortems: automatic insertion of links to SOP and playbook.
Governance ethics: transparency of change and authorship.
AI assistants: context search and TL; DR from the repository.


18) FAQ

Q: Why Git if there's Confluence?
A: Git gives versions, review, automation and reproducibility. Confluence may be the ultimate showcase, but not the source of truth.

Q: How to avoid outdated instructions?
A: SLA for revision (180 days) + Ops-reminder bots + automatic badge of the last check.

Q: Can the CI be connected to the documentation?
A: Yes. Syntax, required fields, and broken references are checked as standard pipeline, similar to code tests.

Contact

Get in Touch

Reach out with any questions or support needs.We are always ready to help!

Start Integration

Email is required. Telegram or WhatsApp — optional.

Your Name optional
Email optional
Subject optional
Message optional
Telegram optional
@
If you include Telegram — we will reply there as well, in addition to Email.
WhatsApp optional
Format: +country code and number (e.g., +380XXXXXXXXX).

By clicking this button, you agree to data processing.