GH GambleHub

Operations and Management → Integration with External Tools

Integrations with external tools

1) Why do you need it

Almost any product platform relies on an external ecosystem: payment providers, KYC/AML, anti-fraud, email/SMS/push, analytics, game studio providers, BI, CDP, task managers, marketing tools. Smartly designed integrations increase conversion and uptime; illiterate - multiply cascading waivers, surprise bills and SLA penalties.

Objectives:
  • Connect providers quickly and safely.
  • Keep SLO business (deposit, bet, withdrawal, game launch).
  • Manage quotas/limits and costs.
  • Reduce failure radius and MTTR.

2) Integration taxonomy

Synchronous APIs (REST/gRPC/GraphQL): instant responses, rigid latency and availability dependency.
Asynchronous (webhook/event/queue): delivery of events, confirmations, less time connectivity.

SDK/client libraries: speed of implementation, but risk of invisible dependencies and "magic."

Batch/ETL/SFTP/file exchange: reports, reconciliation, night uploads.
iFrame/Redirect/Hosted page: fast but less UX/Security control.
Hybrid: synchronous call + asynchronous confirmation (often for payments/ACC).


3) Governance model

Integration directory: owner, contacts, on-call, contracts (OpenAPI/AsyncAPI), versions, environment, keys/secrets, quotas and tariff.
SLO/OLA agreements: what we guarantee the user and what the provider promises; explicit SLO ↔ OLA/SLA relationship.
Release gates: consumer-driven contracts (CDC), compatibility tests, canary inclusions, phicheflags.
Data policies: PII, financial data, GDPR/CCPA, storage regions, DPA with vendors.


4) Security and secrets

Storage of secrets: KMS/Secrets Manager, rotation, principle of least rights, access by role accounts.
Signature and verification: HMAC/JWS for webhooks, mutual TLS for server-server.
IP allowlist/mTLS/WAF: protect inbound and outbound links.
Token scope: narrow API key rights, individual keys by environment.
Audit trail: all outgoing calls and config changes - to the audit log.


5) Quotas, rate limits and reliability

Explicit rate-limit per-provider: so as not to fly to 429/ban.
Bulkhead isolation: dedicated thread/connection pools for each provider.

Timeouts so as not to produce "zombie calls."

Backoff + jitter retrays: for idempotent operations/codes only.
Circuit breaker: A quick "drop" and pullback to follbeck on degradation.
Queue + Outbox: for critical operations - guaranteed delivery and repetition.

Pseudoconfig:

providers:
psp_x:
timeout_ms: 200 rate_limit_rps: 1500 retries: 2 retry_on: [5xx, connect_error]
backoff: exponential jitter: true circuit_breaker:
error_rate_threshold: 0.05 window_s: 10 open_s: 30 pool: dedicated-psp-x (max_conns: 300)

6) Contracts, version and compatibility

OpenAPI/AsyncAPI + SemVer: extensions - backward-compatible; removal - through the deprecate period.
CDC tests: consumer fixes expectations; release of the provider is blocked if incompatible.
Schema Registry (events): evolution of schemes (Avro/JSON-Schema); can-read-old/can-write-new policy.
Change control: change log, migration guides, date of disabling the old version.


7) Mediums and sandboxes

Sandbox/Stage/Prod from the vendor - required.
Test data: PII-like generators, fictitious cards/documents, test wallets.
Contract & integration tests: against the stage with real limits.
Golden-path & chaos-path: happy-case and negative scenarios (timeouts/4xx/5xx/webhook-retries).


8) Observability and dashboards

Метрики per-integration: `outbound_rps`, `p95/p99`, `error_rate`, `retry_rate`, `circuit_open`, `cost_per_1k_calls`.
Webhook health: delivery delay, repetition percentage, signature/validation.
Release/phicheflag events: annotations on graphs.
Dependency map: who refers to the provider where the bottlenecks are.


9) Incidents and escalations

Correlation of alerts: if the provider is a page of the integration owner, not all consumers.
Autodegradation: "minimum mode" feature flags (light content, simplified KYC flow, processing queues).
Feilover/multi-vendor: PSP-X ⇄ PSP-Y, KYC-A ⇄ KYC-B; manual and automatic switch.
Runbook: how to confirm an incident with a vendor, increase quotas, enable an alternative route, roll back.

Runbook pattern (brief):
  • Diagnostics: integration dashboard, vendor status, our logs with 'trace _ id'.
  • Action: Lower the RPS, open the breaker, turn on the feilover, switch the ficheflag.
  • Communications: incident channel, update template for business/support.
  • Rollback/verification: p95/error-rate is normal, queue is processed, expenses are in the limit.

10) Cost management

CPM/CPA/CPC/call model: track 'cost _ per _ 1k _ calls' and "cost of success."

Quotas and "soft-cap": protective thresholds, warnings.
Caching and dedup: reducing unnecessary calls (idempotency keys).
Reports and reconciliation: daily reconciliation of accounts with our logs.


11) Working with webhooks

Delivery: 'at-least-once', repeat with exponential delay, dedup by 'event _ id'.
Security: signature (HMAC/JWS), time stamp, mTLS/allowlist.
Reliability: 2xx response only after writing to outbox/txn, otherwise the provider will retract.

Idempotence: handlers are idempotent, store "seen events."


12) Data, privacy and compliance

Data minimization - request only what you need.
PII/financial data: masking in logs, tokenization, encryption.
Data residency: where data is stored and processed (registers).
DPA/SCC: data processing conventions, sub-processors.
Right to delete/export: API/processes on the vendor side.


13) Anti-patterns

Retrai on the time-outs of the bottleneck → the "storm of retrai."

Common connection pool for all vendors → head-of-line blocking.
No signature/validation webhook → freds and false events.
Secrets in environment variables without rotation and explicit rights.
Lack of CDC and contract versions → massive drops in vendor updates.
Strong tie on SDK without observability → black box.


14) Implementation checklist

  • Integration card in directory: owner, SLA/OLA, tariff, contacts, keys, schemas.
  • OpenAPI/AsyncAPI + CDC; tests for stage, canary inclusion.
  • Timeouts, retrays (idempotency!), Breaker, bulkhead, rate-limit.
  • Secrets: KMS/SM, rotation, single keys per-env.
  • Webhook: signature, dedup, redelivery, outbox.
  • Dashboard and alerts per-integration; release annotations.
  • Failover plan (second provider/manual switch), runbook and contacts.
  • Cost reporting and reconciliation.
  • DPA/compliance, data policy, audit logs.
  • Game-days/chaos for key vendors.

15) Integration Quality KPIs

Success rate for critical operations (deposit/rate/withdrawal).
p95/p99 outgoing calls.
Retry storm count/month (target → 0).
MTTD/MTTR on provider incidents.
Cost per 1k calls/successful action.
CDC pass rate and the proportion of releases without integration incidents.
Webhook latency and repeatability.


16) Rapid defaults

Timeout = 70-80% of the link budget; Request upper timeout is shorter than the sum of internal timeouts.
Retrai ≤ 2, only on 5xx/network, with backoff + jitter.
Circuit breaker: '> 5%' errors for '10s', 'open = 30s', 'half-open' samples.
Rate-limit per-provider, separate connection pool.
Webhook: confirm after recording, dedup by 'event _ id'.

Ficheflag for quick transfer to "minimum mode."


17) Examples of alerts (ideas)


ALERT ProviderErrorRateHigh
IF outbound_error_rate{provider="psp_x"} > 0.05 FOR 5m
LABELS {severity="critical", team="payments"}

ALERT ProviderLatencySLO
IF outbound_p99_latency_ms{provider="kyc_a"} > 300 FOR 10m
LABELS {severity="warning", team="risk"}

ALERT WebhookDeliveryDelayed
IF webhook_delivery_p95_s{provider="studio_y"} > 20 FOR 15m
LABELS {severity="warning", team="games"}

ALERT ProviderCostSpike
IF rate(provider_cost_usd_total[15m]) > 2 baseline_1w
LABELS {severity="info", team="finops"}

18) FAQ

Q: How to distinguish between a temporary provider failure and our problems?
A: See symmetry: increase in errors for all provider customers, opening a breaker, no internal errors/regressions. Traces and logs with'peer. service 'will help.

Q: Do you always need a second provider?
A: For critical paths, yes (PSP/KYC). For less critical ones, degradation and caches are enough.

Q: Vendor SDK or own client?
A: The SDK will speed up the start, but demand observability, timeout/retray config and pinning versions. Otherwise - your client over HTTP/gRPC.

Contact

Get in Touch

Reach out with any questions or support needs.We are always ready to help!

Start Integration

Email is required. Telegram or WhatsApp — optional.

Your Name optional
Email optional
Subject optional
Message optional
Telegram optional
@
If you include Telegram — we will reply there as well, in addition to Email.
WhatsApp optional
Format: +country code and number (e.g., +380XXXXXXXXX).

By clicking this button, you agree to data processing.